In this post, I criticize a number of recent media attempts to describe judicial activism vs. judicial restraint. My main complaint is that they try to rebut claims of judicial activism without really defining the term. And there is no real effort to put forth the other side of the argument.
This LA Times article makes a couple of half-hearted swipes at providing Supreme Court Justice Scalia's point of view, but it distorts his positions more than anything. Anyone want to take a first crack at analyzing the LA Times article?
Hat tip: Becket Wynand